A practical framework for working out which model fits your event, your team and your timeline before you commit to either.
dry hire vs full productionThe language gets blurred. People use "dry hire" to mean different things depending on the sector they work in. So let us be precise about what each model involves before building a framework for choosing between them.
Dry hire makes sense when you have the people, the knowledge and the time to make it work. Those three things together. Not just one of them.
You have a qualified operator. Your crew includes someone who has run this category of equipment before. Not "similar equipment" or "I think I understand it". Someone who has operated this specific type of kit in a live event environment and can troubleshoot it under pressure.
You can specify the kit correctly. You know what you need before you call the hire company. You are not relying on the hire company to tell you what to take. A hire company will help you specify, but the technical accountability on site is yours.
The event budget genuinely supports it. Dry hire is cheaper than full production when it goes well. Factor in what happens if it does not. An unresolved technical problem on site is a cost in damage to the event, not just the hire bill. If the event cannot absorb a technical failure, the saving is not worth it.
You have a contingency plan. Something will go wrong. It always does. What is your fallback for the most critical piece of kit? If you do not have an answer to that question, dry hire is not ready.
Full production is the right answer when the event is complex enough, significant enough, or technically demanding enough that having a specialist team accountable on site is genuinely worth the cost.
It is also the right answer when any of the following are true:
Many bookings sit between the two models. A production company with their own audio crew takes LED panels on dry hire because they do not own the right pitch for this event. A corporate in-house AV team hires a follow spot and a lighting console to supplement the fixtures installed by the venue.
The hybrid model is common and works well when the coordination between owned and hired kit is managed clearly. The person responsible for the technical outcome needs to understand all of the equipment they are operating, regardless of who owns it. Hiring kit from a different company and operating it alongside your own equipment is not an excuse to be less prepared for the interaction between the two.
The mistake in comparing costs between dry hire and full production is comparing only the invoice. The full cost comparison includes:
For a small event with a straightforward kit list and an experienced in-house operator, dry hire will almost certainly be cheaper even on a full-cost basis. For a complex event where the in-house team would be stretched and any technical problem would have a real consequence, the margin between dry hire and full production narrows considerably.
Start with the three questions that matter:
If you answer those three questions honestly and dry hire still makes sense, it probably is the right call. If the answers create doubt, call the production company first.
Tell us what you are planning. We will give you a straight answer about whether dry hire is appropriate, or whether a crewed quote would be a better fit.
Get in Touch